
GAMES
11
MIN
9.1
PTS
3.6
REB
0.7
AST
0.7
FG%
33.3
Season averages
| Season | Phase | Team | GP | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | S+B | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WNBA | |||||||||||||
| 2023 | Regular season | 11 | 0 | 9.1 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 33.3 | 35.7 | 80.0 | |
| 2022 | Regular season | 11 | 10 | 19.8 | 5.9 | 0.7 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 37.3 | 36.1 | 87.5 | |
| 2021 | Regular season | 19 | 19 | 27.6 | 9.4 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 41.4 | 33.7 | 84.2 | |
| 2019 | Regular season | 23 | 23 | 29.5 | 13.0 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 49.4 | 36.0 | 85.7 | |
| 2019 | Playoffs | 9 | 6 | 31.8 | 14.2 | 1.7 | 5.2 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 43.6 | 39.6 | 87.5 | |
| 2018 | Regular season | 33 | 33 | 32.9 | 13.9 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 43.3 | 36.0 | 91.8 | |
| 2018 | Playoffs | 9 | 9 | 36.7 | 13.9 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 38.8 | 23.4 | 84.2 | |
Last 5 seasons. Show all 13 seasons →
Advanced — true shooting, usage, per-36 rates
| Season | Phase | GP | MIN | TS% | eFG% | USG% | TOV% | 3PAr | FTr | PTS/36 | REB/36 | AST/36 | S+B/36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 WNBA | Regular season | 11 | 100 | 48.5 | 46.2 | 22.2 | 14.5 | 0.72 | 0.13 | 14.4 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 1.1 |
| 2022 WNBA | Regular season | 11 | 218 | 56.0 | 50.0 | 16.6 | 30.1 | 0.71 | 0.31 | 10.7 | 1.3 | 5.6 | 0.7 |
| 2021 WNBA | Regular season | 19 | 525 | 52.2 | 50.0 | 17.7 | 15.8 | 0.51 | 0.12 | 12.2 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 1.0 |
| 2019 WNBA | Regular season | 23 | 678 | 59.5 | 57.0 | 20.1 | 15.8 | 0.43 | 0.15 | 15.8 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 1.5 |
| 2019 WNBA | Playoffs | 9 | 286 | 57.4 | 53.0 | 21.2 | 15.2 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 16.1 | 1.9 | 5.9 | 0.3 |
| 2018 WNBA | Regular season | 33 | 1086 | 59.4 | 53.8 | 19.4 | 15.7 | 0.58 | 0.28 | 15.2 | 2.5 | 4.8 | 1.4 |
| 2018 WNBA | Playoffs | 9 | 330 | 48.3 | 45.0 | 20.8 | 14.0 | 0.53 | 0.16 | 13.6 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 1.1 |
Box-score approximations: usage without play-by-play, shooting from season totals. Rates are per 36 minutes.
Season
2023202220212019201820172016201520142013201220112010
Recent form
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
Points over 10.0 in 5/10
Last 15 games — 2014
| Date | Opp | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | PRA | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug | vs PHX | L 68-93 | 30 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 17 | -30 |
| 22 Aug | @ PHX | L 72-75 | 34 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 20 | -2 |
| 16 Aug | @ PHX | L 69-76 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | -14 |
| 15 Aug | vs SEA | W 77-65 | 30 | 20 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 27 | +16 |
| 12 Aug | @ MIN | W 71-63 | 40 | 29 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 37 | +6 |
| 10 Aug | @ LV | L 76-82 | 29 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 19 | -3 |
| 8 Aug | vs ATL | W 80-77 | 40 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 22 | +6 |
| 5 Aug | vs DAL | L 90-96 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 9 | -5 |
| 3 Aug | vs CON | W 70-69 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | -6 |
| 29 Jul | @ PHX | L 69-90 | 32 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 23 | -23 |
| 28 Jul | vs IND | W 77-73 | 37 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 19 | +2 |
| 26 Jul | @ SEA | W 77-69 | 32 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 17 | +3 |
| 24 Jul | vs PHX | L 73-93 | 33 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | -15 |
| 23 Jul | vs NY | L 64-66 | 27 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 25 | +14 |
| 17 Jul | vs WSH | L 75-79 | 34 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 18 | +1 |
Splits — 2014
| Split | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home venue | 18 | 23.4 | 8.8 | 1.9 | 3.6 |
| Away venue | 16 | 25.9 | 11.4 | 1.7 | 3.8 |
| 0-1 days rest | 6 | 27.5 | 9.3 | 1.7 | 4.7 |
| 2-3 days rest | 19 | 23.9 | 9.9 | 1.5 | 3.3 |
| 4+ days rest | 9 | 24.1 | 10.7 | 2.4 | 3.9 |
Hit rates by line — Points, 2014
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
| Points line | Last 5 | Last 10 | Season |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 7.5 | 4/580% | 7/1070% | 21/2972% |
| Over 8.5 | 3/560% | 6/1060% | 19/2966% |
| Over 9.5 | 3/560% | 5/1050% | 15/2952% |
| Over 10.5 – 11.5 | 3/560% | 5/1050% | 13/2945% |
| Over 12.5 | 3/560% | 5/1050% | 12/2941% |
| Over 13.5 | 2/540% | 4/1040% | 8/2928% |
| Over 14.5 | 2/540% | 2/1020% | 6/2921% |
| Over 15.5 – 17.5 | 2/540% | 2/1020% | 5/2917% |
How often Kristi Toliver finished above each line. These are our own thresholds, not a sportsbook's — no odds are involved.