GAMES
26
MIN
10.9
PTS
2.4
REB
1.8
AST
0.7
FG%
45.6
Season averages
| Season | Phase | Team | GP | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | S+B | FG% | 3P% | FT% | PIR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basketball Bundesliga | ||||||||||||||
| 2015-16 | Regular season |  CRA | 26 | 0 | 10.9 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 45.6 | 0.0 | 41.7 | 2.5 |
| 2014-15 | Regular season |  MHP | 34 | 0 | 10.8 | 3.7 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 55.8 | — | 58.0 | 3.8 |
| 2014-15 | Playoffs | MHP | 3 | 0 | 7.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | — | — | 3.0 |
| 2013-14 | Regular season | MHP | 34 | 0 | 13.6 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 52.9 | — | 66.7 | 4.1 |
| 2013-14 | Playoffs | MHP | 4 | 0 | 24.6 | 7.5 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 55.6 | — | 58.8 | 12.5 |
| 2010-11 | Regular season |  TBB | 18 | 0 | 15.9 | 4.4 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 50.9 | — | 53.5 | 3.4 |
| EuroCup | ||||||||||||||
| 2009-10 | Regular season | TBB | 6 | 1 | 25.0 | 7.7 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 62.5 | — | 60.0 | 9.8 |
Advanced — true shooting, usage, per-36 rates
| Season | Phase | GP | MIN | TS% | eFG% | USG% | TOV% | 3PAr | FTr | PTS/36 | REB/36 | AST/36 | S+B/36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 Basketball Bundesliga | Regular season | 26 | 284 | 45.9 | 45.6 | 13.9 | 17.2 | 0.02 | 0.42 | 7.9 | 6.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| 2014-15 Basketball Bundesliga | Regular season | 34 | 368 | 57.9 | 55.8 | 15.9 | 13.6 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 12.2 | 8.7 | 0.1 | 2.8 |
| 2013-14 Basketball Bundesliga | Regular season | 34 | 464 | 55.7 | 52.9 | 12.6 | 21.2 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 0.7 | 2.9 |
| 2013-14 Basketball Bundesliga | Playoffs | 4 | 98 | 58.9 | 55.6 | 13.9 | 10.5 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 11.0 | 8.8 | 1.1 | 3.3 |
| 2010-11 Basketball Bundesliga | Regular season | 18 | 286 | 53.4 | 50.9 | 15.8 | 21.3 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 9.9 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 2009-10 EuroCup | Regular season | 6 | 150 | 63.2 | 62.5 | 14.2 | 18.0 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 11.1 | 8.2 | 0.7 | 2.9 |
Box-score approximations: usage without play-by-play, shooting from season totals. Rates are per 36 minutes.
Season
2015-162014-152013-142010-112009-10
Recent form
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
Last opponent · TUB 8.8% more points allowed to forwards than the league average (26.72 vs 24.55) · 32 games+8.8%
Points over 2.5 in 2/10
Last 15 games — 2015-16
| Date | Opp | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | PRA | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 May | @ HAG | L 83-94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 29 Apr | vs TUB | L 74-91 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 |
| 24 Apr | @ BRE | L 64-72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 22 Apr | vs BAY | L 78-89 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 16 Apr | @ ALB | L 68-90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| 9 Apr | vs MHP | L 74-75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2 Apr | vs WUE | L 70-81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 28 Mar | @ ULM | L 79-83 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 18 Mar | @ GIE | L 79-83 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| 16 Mar | vs BRA | L 79-88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 5 Mar | @ EBO | L 57-83 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -7 |
| 26 Feb | vs MBC | L 71-85 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 |
| 13 Feb | vs BRO | L 53-93 | 19 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | -22 |
| 10 Feb | vs GOT | L 63-96 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | -13 |
| 6 Feb | @ BAY | L 70-78 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4 |
Splits — 2015-16
| Split | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home venue | 16 | 8.8 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Away venue | 17 | 8.4 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.3 |
| 2-3 days rest | 6 | 10.0 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 0.7 |
| 4+ days rest | 26 | 7.9 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.5 |
| Season opener rest | 1 | 19.3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
Hit rates by line — Points, 2015-16
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
| Points line | Last 5 | Last 10 | Season |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 0/50% | 3/1030% | 15/2658% |
| Over 1.5 | 0/50% | 3/1030% | 14/2654% |
| Over 2.5 | 0/50% | 2/1020% | 10/2638% |
| Over 3.5 | 0/50% | 2/1020% | 9/2635% |
| Over 4.5 – 5.5 | 0/50% | 1/1010% | 6/2623% |
How often Julien Patrick Flomo finished above each line. These are our own thresholds, not a sportsbook's — no odds are involved.