
GAMES
24
MIN
9.8
PTS
2.5
REB
0.9
AST
0.3
FG%
25.9
Season averages
| Season | Phase | Team | GP | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | S+B | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WNBA | |||||||||||||
| 2021 | Regular season | 24 | 0 | 9.8 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 25.9 | 21.2 | 40.0 | |
| 2020 | Regular season | 22 | 15 | 21.7 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 34.1 | 33.3 | 100.0 | |
| 2019 | Regular season | 34 | 34 | 23.7 | 9.0 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 40.8 | 38.2 | 81.5 | |
| 2019 | Playoffs | 8 | 8 | 27.9 | 8.8 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 41.0 | 34.3 | 88.9 | |
| 2018 | Regular season | 34 | 30 | 18.8 | 6.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 43.0 | 43.0 | 85.7 | |
| 2018 | Playoffs | 1 | 1 | 23.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | — | |
| 2017 | Regular season | 34 | 29 | 27.3 | 8.6 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 41.1 | 41.0 | 86.5 | |
| 2017 | Playoffs | 1 | 1 | 25.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 28.6 | 20.0 | 0.0 | |
Last 5 seasons. Show all 10 seasons →
Advanced — true shooting, usage, per-36 rates
| Season | Phase | GP | MIN | TS% | eFG% | USG% | TOV% | 3PAr | FTr | PTS/36 | REB/36 | AST/36 | S+B/36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 WNBA | Regular season | 24 | 235 | 34.4 | 34.1 | 17.1 | 3.3 | 0.78 | 0.06 | 9.2 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| 2020 WNBA | Regular season | 22 | 477 | 47.7 | 46.0 | 14.3 | 9.6 | 0.72 | 0.06 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2019 WNBA | Regular season | 34 | 807 | 57.3 | 55.7 | 15.8 | 9.5 | 0.78 | 0.11 | 13.7 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| 2019 WNBA | Playoffs | 8 | 223 | 53.9 | 50.8 | 14.4 | 11.0 | 0.57 | 0.15 | 11.3 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 2018 WNBA | Regular season | 34 | 638 | 60.5 | 59.2 | 13.8 | 9.3 | 0.75 | 0.08 | 12.6 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| 2017 WNBA | Regular season | 34 | 928 | 59.2 | 56.5 | 12.8 | 10.5 | 0.75 | 0.16 | 11.4 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
Box-score approximations: usage without play-by-play, shooting from season totals. Rates are per 36 minutes.
Season
2021202020192018201720162015201420132012
Recent form
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
Points over 9.0 in 3/10
Last 15 games — 2012
| Date | Opp | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | PRA | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct | @ MIN | L 72-73 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -15 |
| 30 Sept | vs MIN | W 86-79 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | -4 |
| 28 Sept | @ MIN | L 70-78 | 23 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 0 |
| 23 Sept | @ PHX | W 71-57 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | +9 |
| 21 Sept | vs LV | W 84-75 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 15 | +7 |
| 18 Sept | vs CHI | W 75-60 | 29 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| 16 Sept | vs CON | L 58-60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Sept | @ LV | L 66-90 | 29 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | -14 |
| 12 Sept | @ IND | L 48-72 | 37 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 | -23 |
| 11 Sept | @ ATL | L 61-77 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | -17 |
| 8 Sept | @ DAL | W 89-66 | 27 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 14 | +9 |
| 6 Sept | vs DAL | W 101-74 | 31 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 25 | +6 |
| 30 Aug | vs PHX | L 68-75 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 0 |
| 26 Aug | vs NY | W 84-66 | 25 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 18 | +4 |
| 23 Aug | vs IND | L 66-68 | 20 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 18 | +17 |
Splits — 2012
| Split | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home venue | 18 | 20.8 | 7.9 | 4.6 | 1.1 |
| Away venue | 19 | 22.7 | 7.3 | 3.8 | 1.2 |
| 0-1 days rest | 5 | 24.0 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 1.2 |
| 2-3 days rest | 20 | 21.0 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 1.0 |
| 4+ days rest | 12 | 22.2 | 7.7 | 3.4 | 1.4 |
Hit rates by line — Points, 2012
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
| Points line | Last 5 | Last 10 | Season |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 3.5 | 4/580% | 9/1090% | 30/3683% |
| Over 4.5 | 4/580% | 9/1090% | 26/3672% |
| Over 5.5 | 3/560% | 7/1070% | 21/3658% |
| Over 6.5 – 7.5 | 3/560% | 5/1050% | 18/3650% |
| Over 8.5 | 3/560% | 4/1040% | 16/3644% |
| Over 9.5 | 2/540% | 3/1030% | 13/3636% |
| Over 10.5 | 1/520% | 1/1010% | 11/3631% |
| Over 11.5 | 1/520% | 1/1010% | 10/3628% |
| Over 12.5 | 1/520% | 1/1010% | 7/3619% |
How often Shekinna Stricklen finished above each line. These are our own thresholds, not a sportsbook's — no odds are involved.