GAMES
2
MIN
29.0
PTS
16.0
REB
2.5
AST
0.0
FG%
64.7
Season averages
| Season | Phase | Team | GP | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | S+B | FG% | 3P% | FT% | PIR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EuroCup | ||||||||||||||
| 2011-12 | Regular season | 2 | 2 | 29.0 | 16.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 64.7 | 88.9 | 100.0 | 13.0 | |
| Lega Basket Serie A | ||||||||||||||
| 2011-12 | Regular season | 24 | 24 | 30.2 | 10.3 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 39.6 | 34.8 | 91.2 | 7.7 | |
| EuroCup | ||||||||||||||
| 2011-12 | Playoffs | 6 | 6 | 27.0 | 11.3 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 43.6 | 50.0 | 88.9 | 7.5 | |
| Lega Basket Serie A | ||||||||||||||
| 2010-11 | Regular season | VA | 14 | 12 | 31.5 | 13.1 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 43.3 | 39.7 | 76.0 | 10.6 |
| EuroLeague | ||||||||||||||
| 2008-09 | Regular season | 15 | 11 | 25.1 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 44.2 | 39.5 | 87.9 | 7.5 | |
Advanced — true shooting, usage, per-36 rates
| Season | Phase | GP | MIN | TS% | eFG% | USG% | TOV% | 3PAr | FTr | PTS/36 | REB/36 | AST/36 | S+B/36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 EuroCup | Regular season | 2 | 58 | 89.5 | 88.2 | 18.5 | 10.1 | 0.53 | 0.12 | 19.9 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2011-12 Lega Basket Serie A | Regular season | 24 | 725 | 51.9 | 48.4 | 18.3 | 13.5 | 0.50 | 0.15 | 12.2 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 0.9 |
| 2011-12 EuroCup | Playoffs | 6 | 162 | 57.7 | 54.5 | 20.9 | 10.6 | 0.44 | 0.16 | 15.1 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 |
| 2010-11 Lega Basket Serie A | Regular season | 14 | 441 | 54.8 | 52.5 | 20.9 | 15.6 | 0.46 | 0.16 | 15.0 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| 2008-09 EuroLeague | Regular season | 15 | 376 | 59.3 | 55.1 | 22.7 | 10.0 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 17.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Box-score approximations: usage without play-by-play, shooting from season totals. Rates are per 36 minutes.
Season
Recent form
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
Last opponent · CRE 9.9% more points allowed to guards than the league average (38.18 vs 34.73) · 28 games+9.9%
Points over 10.0 in 5/10
Last 15 games — 2011-12
| Date | Opp | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | PRA | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 May | @ CRE | L 82-84 | 33 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 25 | +1 |
| 2 May | vs EA7 | L 76-84 | 28 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | -5 |
| 28 Apr | @ URV | W 72-61 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | +11 |
| 25 Apr | vs VA | L 55-71 | 32 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | -17 |
| 22 Apr | @ MPS | L 67-90 | 25 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -26 |
| 15 Apr | vs VIR | W 63-59 | 34 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | +7 |
| 7 Apr | @ DSS | L 77-89 | 31 | 14 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 29 | -5 |
| 1 Apr | @ ROM | L 99-102 | 35 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | -1 |
| 24 Mar | vs MGR | W 95-91 | 29 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 24 | -1 |
| 18 Mar | @ BLL | W 96-94 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | -9 |
| 7 Mar | vs PS | L 66-77 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -2 |
| 4 Mar | vs CSL | W 66-63 | 27 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | +8 |
| 28 Feb | vs RYT | L 74-80 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| 26 Feb | @ CTU | L 67-79 | 26 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 15 | -12 |
| 21 Feb | @ ALB | L 74-83 | 32 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 |
Splits — 2011-12
| Split | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home venue | 17 | 28.2 | 10.6 | 2.5 | 1.1 |
| Away venue | 15 | 31.0 | 11.0 | 3.3 | 1.5 |
| 2-3 days rest | 6 | 28.2 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 4+ days rest | 26 | 29.9 | 11.5 | 3.1 | 1.3 |
Hit rates by line — Points, 2011-12
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
| Points line | Last 5 | Last 10 | Season |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 5.5 | 3/560% | 8/1080% | 25/3278% |
| Over 6.5 | 3/560% | 8/1080% | 24/3275% |
| Over 7.5 | 2/540% | 5/1050% | 21/3266% |
| Over 8.5 | 2/540% | 5/1050% | 18/3256% |
| Over 9.5 | 2/540% | 5/1050% | 17/3253% |
| Over 10.5 | 2/540% | 5/1050% | 16/3250% |
| Over 11.5 | 2/540% | 5/1050% | 14/3244% |
| Over 12.5 | 1/520% | 3/1030% | 12/3238% |
| Over 13.5 | 1/520% | 3/1030% | 11/3234% |
| Over 14.5 – 15.5 | 1/520% | 2/1020% | 7/3222% |
| Over 16.5 | 1/520% | 2/1020% | 6/3219% |
| Over 17.5 | 1/520% | 2/1020% | 5/3216% |
How often Jobey Thomas finished above each line. These are our own thresholds, not a sportsbook's — no odds are involved.