GAMES
34
MIN
23.1
PTS
4.1
REB
5.4
AST
2.1
FG%
42.9
Season averages
| Season | Phase | Team | GP | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | S+B | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WNBA | |||||||||||||
| 2016 | Regular season |  LV | 34 | 34 | 23.1 | 4.1 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 42.9 | 0.0 | 73.5 |
| 2015 | Regular season | LV | 29 | 28 | 23.2 | 3.4 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 38.2 | 0.0 | 64.7 |
| 2014 | Regular season | LV | 34 | 34 | 24.8 | 4.9 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 53.8 | 100.0 | 60.5 |
| 2014 | Playoffs | LV | 2 | 2 | 19.5 | 0.0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | — | — |
| 2013 | Regular season | LV | 29 | 29 | 26.6 | 5.9 | 8.9 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 57.9 | 33.3 | 59.2 |
| 2012 | Regular season | LV | 33 | 30 | 18.8 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 55.3 | 0.0 | 75.9 |
| 2012 | Playoffs | LV | 2 | 2 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 66.7 | — | — |
Last 5 seasons. Show all 7 seasons →
Advanced — true shooting, usage, per-36 rates
| Season | Phase | GP | MIN | TS% | eFG% | USG% | TOV% | 3PAr | FTr | PTS/36 | REB/36 | AST/36 | S+B/36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 WNBA | Regular season | 34 | 786 | 49.1 | 42.9 | 11.6 | 27.8 | 0.03 | 0.41 | 6.3 | 8.4 | 3.3 | 3.0 |
| 2015 WNBA | Regular season | 29 | 673 | 42.7 | 38.2 | 11.0 | 25.5 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| 2014 WNBA | Regular season | 34 | 844 | 56.1 | 54.2 | 11.0 | 24.0 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 7.1 | 11.5 | 3.1 | 2.0 |
| 2014 WNBA | Playoffs | 2 | 39 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 33.3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 10.2 | 3.7 | 0.9 |
| 2013 WNBA | Regular season | 29 | 770 | 59.6 | 58.3 | 11.2 | 23.6 | 0.02 | 0.40 | 7.9 | 12.1 | 2.7 | 2.9 |
| 2012 WNBA | Regular season | 33 | 619 | 59.3 | 55.3 | 10.2 | 28.5 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 6.7 | 12.4 | 2.3 | 2.7 |
Box-score approximations: usage without play-by-play, shooting from season totals. Rates are per 36 minutes.
Season
Recent form
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
Points+Reb+Ast over 15.0 in 3/10
Last 15 games — 2014
| Date | Opp | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | PRA | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug | vs MIN | L 89-94 | 20 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 12 | +1 |
| 21 Aug | @ MIN | L 84-88 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -26 |
| 17 Aug | @ CHI | W 84-72 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | -5 |
| 15 Aug | vs MIN | W 92-76 | 25 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 11 | +5 |
| 10 Aug | vs LA | W 82-76 | 35 | 8 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 34 | +7 |
| 8 Aug | @ DAL | L 62-79 | 24 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 11 | -16 |
| 7 Aug | vs PHX | L 73-78 | 28 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 17 | -7 |
| 3 Aug | @ SEA | L 65-71 | 32 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
| 1 Aug | vs CON | L 79-89 | 20 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 11 | -25 |
| 29 Jul | vs CHI | W 92-74 | 27 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 13 | +13 |
| 26 Jul | vs IND | L 68-75 | 30 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 15 | -4 |
| 25 Jul | @ MIN | L 78-88 | 27 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 26 | 0 |
| 22 Jul | vs DAL | W 95-93 | 19 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 13 | -2 |
| 17 Jul | @ DAL | L 90-95 | 24 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 10 | -13 |
| 13 Jul | @ PHX | L 61-90 | 22 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 13 | -20 |
Splits — 2014
| Split | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home venue | 18 | 24.6 | 4.7 | 8.3 | 2.5 |
| Away venue | 18 | 24.4 | 4.6 | 7.3 | 1.8 |
| 0-1 days rest | 10 | 22.9 | 4.2 | 7.8 | 2.2 |
| 2-3 days rest | 14 | 26.1 | 5.7 | 8.9 | 2.4 |
| 4+ days rest | 12 | 24.0 | 3.8 | 6.5 | 1.8 |
Hit rates by line — Points+Reb+Ast, 2014
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
| Points+Reb+Ast line | Last 5 | Last 10 | Season |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 8.5 – 9.5 | 3/560% | 8/1080% | 30/3683% |
| Over 10.5 | 3/560% | 8/1080% | 29/3681% |
| Over 11.5 | 2/540% | 5/1050% | 26/3672% |
| Over 12.5 | 1/520% | 4/1040% | 24/3667% |
| Over 13.5 | 1/520% | 3/1030% | 18/3650% |
| Over 14.5 | 1/520% | 3/1030% | 16/3644% |
| Over 15.5 | 1/520% | 3/1030% | 13/3636% |
| Over 16.5 | 1/520% | 2/1020% | 12/3633% |
| Over 17.5 | 1/520% | 1/1010% | 9/3625% |
| Over 18.5 – 19.5 | 1/520% | 1/1010% | 7/3619% |
| Over 20.5 | 1/520% | 1/1010% | 6/3617% |
How often Jayne Appel-Marinelli finished above each line. These are our own thresholds, not a sportsbook's — no odds are involved.