GAMES
36
MIN
15.8
PTS
9.8
REB
4.1
AST
0.9
FG%
55.6
Season averages
| Season | Phase | Team | GP | GS | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | S+B | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBA | |||||||||||||
| 2015-16 | Regular season |  PHI | 36 | 12 | 15.8 | 9.8 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 55.6 | 46.2 | 73.6 |
| 2014-15 | Regular season |  SAC | 70 | 15 | 17.1 | 7.2 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 51.5 | — | 82.0 |
| 2013-14 | Regular season | SAC | 18 | 1 | 12.9 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 51.7 | — | 82.4 |
| 2012-13 | Regular season |  GS | 81 | 2 | 23.2 | 10.8 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 54.0 | 33.3 | 81.7 |
| 2012-13 | Playoffs | GS | 12 | 3 | 20.7 | 11.8 | 5.2 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 52.0 | — | 73.1 |
| 2011-12 | Regular season |  NO | 41 | 8 | 24.4 | 12.5 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 50.3 | 0.0 | 79.9 |
Last 5 seasons. Show all 6 seasons →
Advanced — true shooting, usage, per-36 rates
| Season | Phase | GP | MIN | TS% | eFG% | USG% | TOV% | 3PAr | FTr | PTS/36 | REB/36 | AST/36 | S+B/36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 NBA | Regular season | 36 | 570 | 60.5 | 56.8 | 24.0 | 7.1 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 22.2 | 9.2 | 2.0 | 1.3 |
| 2014-15 NBA | Regular season | 70 | 1195 | 57.8 | 51.5 | 18.2 | 11.0 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 15.2 | 8.1 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 2013-14 NBA | Regular season | 18 | 233 | 56.3 | 51.7 | 14.5 | 11.8 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 11.7 | 8.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 2012-13 NBA | Regular season | 81 | 1879 | 60.5 | 54.1 | 20.0 | 13.7 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 16.7 | 9.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| 2012-13 NBA | Playoffs | 12 | 248 | 57.8 | 52.0 | 25.6 | 13.4 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 20.6 | 9.0 | 2.5 | 1.3 |
| 2011-12 NBA | Regular season | 41 | 1001 | 57.7 | 50.3 | 28.5 | 12.6 | 0.01 | 0.51 | 18.4 | 7.7 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
Box-score approximations: usage without play-by-play, shooting from season totals. Rates are per 36 minutes.
Season
2015-162014-152013-142012-132011-122010-11
Recent form
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
Points over 6.0 in 8/10
Last 15 games — 2015-16
| Date | Opp | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | PRA | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Apr | @ CHI | L 105-115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 12 Apr | @ TOR | L 98-122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 10 Apr | vs MIL | L 108-109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 8 Apr | vs NY | L 102-109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 5 Apr | vs NO | W 107-93 | 26 | 22 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 32 | +19 |
| 2 Apr | vs IND | L 102-115 | 23 | 19 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 27 | -17 |
| 1 Apr | @ CHA | L 91-100 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 28 | -16 |
| 29 Mar | vs CHA | L 85-100 | 22 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 14 | -18 |
| 27 Mar | @ GS | L 105-117 | 25 | 22 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 33 | -3 |
| 26 Mar | @ POR | L 105-108 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 | -13 |
| 23 Mar | @ DEN | L 103-104 | 24 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 24 | -1 |
| 21 Mar | @ IND | L 75-91 | 22 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 11 | -5 |
| 20 Mar | vs BOS | L 105-120 | 25 | 26 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 34 | +3 |
| 18 Mar | vs OKC | L 97-111 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| 17 Mar | vs WSH | L 94-99 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -15 |
Splits — 2015-16
| Split | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home venue | 32 | 9.4 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 0.4 |
| Away venue | 33 | 8.2 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 0.6 |
| 0-1 days rest | 20 | 10.4 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 0.7 |
| 2-3 days rest | 41 | 7.6 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.4 |
| 4+ days rest | 4 | 12.8 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 |
Hit rates by line — Points, 2015-16
PointsReboundsAssistsThreesPts+Reb+Ast
| Points line | Last 5 | Last 10 | Season |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 5/5100% | 10/10100% | 29/3681% |
| Over 3.5 | 5/5100% | 10/10100% | 26/3672% |
| Over 4.5 – 5.5 | 5/5100% | 8/1080% | 24/3667% |
| Over 6.5 – 7.5 | 5/5100% | 8/1080% | 21/3658% |
| Over 8.5 | 4/580% | 7/1070% | 19/3653% |
| Over 9.5 | 4/580% | 7/1070% | 18/3650% |
| Over 10.5 | 4/580% | 7/1070% | 15/3642% |
| Over 11.5 | 4/580% | 7/1070% | 13/3636% |
| Over 12.5 – 14.5 | 4/580% | 6/1060% | 12/3633% |
| Over 15.5 | 4/580% | 6/1060% | 11/3631% |
| Over 16.5 – 17.5 | 3/560% | 4/1040% | 6/3617% |
How often Carl Landry finished above each line. These are our own thresholds, not a sportsbook's — no odds are involved.